Pedagogical Adoption of Reference Resources
When it comes to the adoption of a new
concept or pedagogical strategy, a learning leader cannot force the adoption on
the stakeholders involved. As if being converted to a belief system,
stakeholders must first believe that the perceived outcome of the change is one
worth trying to attain even if it means changing their current systems. To get
stakeholders to that place takes a very careful presentation.
Once the learning
leader has been successful in gaining the approval and willingness of their
stakeholders (teachers), the implementation process can occur. However, through
the process of implementation comes a myriad of questions along the way. I
would argue that, if the learning leader does not sufficiently and respectfully
attend to the questions of the stakeholder, the new system may fail at this
early stage.
In any given roll-out
of a program or idea, if teachers feel something is being prescribed upon them,
they often reject the idea regardless of whether or not they believe in its
success. A teacher’s practice is very personal.
As Teacher
Librarians, we deal with many different stakeholders. Sometimes we are put in a
place where we are the “idea-pitcher” as if in a corporate meeting and we are
asking the administrator to be an adopter of a new concept or pedagogical
strategy. Sometimes we are the recipient of the change, equal to the teachers, trying
our best to implement all-school strategies into our Library Learning Commons. And
sometimes we are the bartender who, in the center of the school, hears teacher’s
dissatisfaction towards an all-school change they are being forced to adopt by
the administrator. We quickly learn how to and not to implement change.
With this in mind,
I have outlined below the situation, experiences and methods of two teachers in
regard to their current use of reference materials and resources. I have designed
an approach that will take each of them into a higher level of integration,
application, and embedding of these potential resources into their practice.
Colleague #1: Brand new teacher. Theme:
Lean on me.
Ava is an early career teacher who,
due to the teacher shortage, worked as a TTOC for only a few weeks before being
given a short, term position last spring in a grade 5 classroom with few
management issues. This year, however, she has the hardest class in the school,
a grade 5/6 split with high needs and plenty of behavior concerns to fill her
day. Ava is very open with me about how she feels she is barely keeping her
head above water.
In concern to her programming and
planning, Ava is overwhelmed with parent meetings and behavior concerns that
she mostly relies on quick fixes to fill her academic day. Using either lessons
she picked up during her few weeks as a TTOC or ones she finds for free on
Teachers Pay Teachers, Ava knows her strategies aren’t sustainable.
In an interview with her I learned
that she wasn’t aware of the potential that can result from collaborating with
a TL. In fact, she wasn’t aware of the role of a TL at all. She is very open to
collaboration with me. I asked her what her pedagogical goals are to which she
answered that she would love to deliver lessons where students’ depth of thought
is challenged and where the skills being taught are long-lasting. No band-aids;
no time-fillers. Her ideal would be for students to be inspired to take
ownership of their own learning through inquiry-based learning strategies. She
has never seen this facilitated nor had she done it herself. Okay! I can work
with that!
Adoption Pitch: Resource and Inquiry
Lesson
Using the
concerns-based adoption model, I went forward with an idea I believed in.
I pitched her an
idea of using the web-based Canadian Encyclopedia that our school district has
linked to our school webpage. It is a reference database that I have found to
be user-friendly. The text features make it easy for kids to place different
events in Canadian history. I suggested that this resource would be a perfect
jumping point for her to allow students to choose a social studies inquiry
project based around a theme in Canadian history that they find interesting. I
showed her the source and simulated the type of information students could
glean with a few chosen topics. After giving her a full scope of the potential
of the reference material and some suggestions towards implementation, I left
her alone to play with it.
0: Unconcerned
|
“I think I heard something about it, but I'm
too busy right now with other priorities to be concerned about it.
|
Stage of Concern
completed:
#1 Informational –
“I would like to know more about it”
#2 Personal – “How will using it affect me?”(Loucks-Horsley, 1996)
#2 Personal – “How will using it affect me?”
(Suggested
Reference Material: https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/collections)
Reassess through Questioning:
Ava prepared the
lessons using the suggested resource. She brought up some concerns about using the
resource and the inquiry lesson model. She had questions about the safety of sending
kids to the internet, of the weakness felt by taking away whole-class
instruction for this assignment, and how to create a valid assessment tool to
cover multiple topics as well as the use of the resource.
These questions
showed me that she has really done some great thinking!
Her and I are
currently in discussions to the answer for these questions. As a learning
leader, I am excited to see her dip her toe into different types of lesson
delivery and trust experts who put together this reference material to be the
educator for her students. The reality is that neither she nor I could relay the
material better than the historians and curators who have created that
reference material.
Through this
process of her adoption of a reference resource, using the strategies found in Susan Loucks-Horsley’s “The Concerns-Based
Adoption Model (CBAM): A Model for Change in Individuals”, I focused on
tweaking the idea to personalize it to her preferences and the needs of her
students. Through continued and ever-changing support from me, my hope is that
Ava will move from a “Mechanical” use of the innovation to, eventually, full “Integration”
of these changes and that her pedagogy is something she can be proud of.
Colleague
#2: Retiring Teacher Theme: Try it out!
On the other end
of the spectrum, a colleague and friend of mine is in her last year before
retirement. She has had a fruitful career where she has honed lesson delivery
and classroom management for intermediate students. At a staff meeting I presented
on how we are going to pull most of the old dictionaries from 1998 (see Assignment
1) and move towards a more modern reference material. When I outlined the outdatedness
and lack of sensitivity in the ancient dictionaries, most teachers were nodding
their heads or were at least indifferent. After the presentation, however, this
colleague, Margo, expressed concerns.
The following course
of events I have not yet carried out, but it is simply a designed approach to
take Margo to a higher level of integration and application of potential
resources into her practice.
“Change is a highly personal experience, involving
developmental growth in feelings (the Stages of Concern) and skills (the Levels
of Use). More to the point, people need sustained help along the way if they’re
going to fully implement a new idea, and they’ll require different kinds of
help as their needs change." (Loucks-Horsley, 1996)
Stage of Concern
completed:
#1 Awareness – “What
is it?”
#2 Informational – “I would like to know more about it”, “How does it work?”
#3 Personal – “How will using it affect me?”(Loucks-Horsley, 1996)
#2 Informational – “I would like to know more about it”, “How does it work?”
#3 Personal – “How will using it affect me?”
I find that sometimes people just need
their concerns voiced before signing on to a project. I have Margo fill out the
Stages of Concern Questionnaire(http://www.sedl.org/cbam/)
and we go through each concern together. I answer her questions
when I can and am honest when I can’t.
This questionnaire helps because the
data gives the learning leader knowledge that they can use to target that
specific concern. (Southwest Educational Development Laboratory (SEDL), 2015) . If her questions theme around her displeasure
about getting rid of the old dictionaries, I center my answers and guidance
around that. If her questions
theme around hesitation towards the new reference material, I center my answers
a guidance around that.
No matter what takes
form in Margo’s journey in her pedagogical practice towards using reference
materials, I must make sure that foremostly I am her listening ear and
encourager. I can help her implement the new Merriam-Webster dictionary app
with her students through a collaborative co-teaching session, or I can show
her how students writing can be taken to the next level using a thesaurus
function. Another strategy would be to team her up with another teacher who has
fully ditched the old dictionaries and implemented the use of new digital ones.
Each of these
would move her from:
#3 Personal – “How will using it affect me?”
#3 Personal – “How will using it affect me?”
To
#4 Management – “How
can I master the skills and fit it all in?” (Loucks-Horsley, 1996)
In time, through
seeing 21st century learners take to the new reference materials
smoothly and seeing the potential that can come from the addition of tools to
the digital dictionary, I hope Margo will move towards the #6 Collaboration stage
where she has honed her own strategies but she is looking to others for more
ideas.
Bibliography
CBAM: The Concerns-Based Adoption Model. (2015, December 8). Retrieved from American
Institute for Research:
https://www.air.org/resource/concerns-based-adoption-model-cbam
Featured Collections. (2020). Retrieved from The Canadian Encyclopedia:
https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/collections
Loucks-Horsley, S. (1996). The Concerns-based
Adoption Model (CBAM): A Model for Change in Individuals. Professional
Development for Science Education: A Critical and Immediate Challenge.
Retrieved 2020, from
https://s3.wp.wsu.edu/uploads/sites/731/2015/07/CBAM-explanation.pdf
Oris, A. (n.d.). Intro to CBAM. Retrieved
from Concerns-Based Adoption Model :
https://sites.google.com/site/ch7cbam/home/introduction
Southwest Educational Development Laboratory (SEDL).
(2015, December 8). Concerns-Based Adoption Model (CBAM). SEDL Archive.
Retrieved from http://www.sedl.org/cbam/
Comments
Post a Comment